Berlin has given its official response to the Nefertiti Summit and Zahi Hawass’ plans to formally demand the return of the bust of Nefertiti to Egypt—ain’t gonna happen. 

German officials claim that the artifact’s constitution has already been evaluated and she is too fragile for travel, and that the Nefertiti Summit was never about the merits of Egypt’s case to begin with.

Meanwhile, Zahi Hawass intends to assemble a repatriation alliance based on his own model.  “Our strategy became a good case for everyone…. China announced they will do same as we do” (Source: M&C: “Egypt to aid return of Asian, African stolen artifacts”).

It seems rather convenient timing for Berlin to announce after the Nefertiti Summit had ended in stalemate that the analysis of the artifact’s travel worthiness had already been conducted, and with results favorable to Germany.  One would think that Berlin would have been more transparent about the evaluation from the beginning, and that such news might have been deemed relevant to the December 20, 2009, meeting between Dr. Zahi Hawass and Dr. Friederike Seyfried of the Berlin Egyptian Museum.

An independent evaluation of the artifact’s ability to withstand transport has been something those of us on the sidelines have been asking for all along.  For us, watching this debacle has been like watching a favorite niece being jerked around by self-centered parents in a nasty divorce.  But Germany’s thirteenth-hour claim that such a study has been conducted, sans details, invites healthy skepticism. 

Regarding the documentary evidence, neither Egypt nor Germany has changed their stand one inch.  According to Dr. Seyfried, “The position of the German side is clear and unambiguous – the acquisition of the bust by the Prussian state [of Germany] was legal,” (Source:  BBC:  “Germany refuses to return Nefertiti bust to Egypt”).

But Germany and Egypt seem to have had different expectations regarding December 20 meeting from the very beginning.  Seyfried, contrary to both the Egyptians and the world media, denies that the meeting was ever about Nefertiti, but was instead an opportunity to discuss future joint exhibitions (Source:  AFP:  “Germany dismisses Egyptian claims to Nefertiti bust”). 

This is contrary to Dr. Hawass’ press release which states specifically that the talks were for the purpose of discussing the bust, and that Dr. Seyfried was to “act as liaison between Dr. Hawass and the relevant German officials” (Source: Zahi Hawass’ BlogPress Release -Meeting with Berlin Museum Director).

This leads one to wonder if the media savvy Hawass essentially hijacked the occasion to focus attention on his own agenda.  Certainly Hawass has always made the repatriation of artifacts a priority, but is the current steroidal emphasis on the subject intended to solidify his new role as Vice Minister of Culture?

Zahi Hawass has always enjoyed a cosmopolitan appeal, but his new position as a Vice Minister adds a more official element to his international dealings.  As champion of Egyptian culture, it would be easy for Dr. Hawass to justify (in his own mind, at least) redefining the purpose of the meeting with Dr. Seyfried from a general administrative function to a summit discussing the repatriation of the bust of Nefertiti. 

And the media, current company included, has been complicit.  Germany has insisted, quite openly, that the meeting was not about the fate of Nefertiti.  In my own defense I might add that Berlin’s protestations could have been a little less vague regarding the purpose of the meeting, and the fact that Dr. Seyfried did use the occasion to present Germany’s evidence that the bust was acquired legally shows that the issue was at least on the menu.

But Dr. Hawass is an old hand at playing to the media, and his repatriation efforts seem to be expanding in both momentum and scope.  According to a speech he gave last week, he intends to build a coalition of nations who feel they have been cheated out of their heritages.

“At the end of March,” Hawass proclaimed, “we will hold a conference to meet with others who suffered like us from stolen artifacts and to discuss how to help all of us in efforts to return the stolen artifacts” (Source: M&C: “Egypt to aid return of Asian, African stolen artifacts”).

Whether Nefertiti is ever returned to Egypt or not, she is clearly serving a diplomatic role for Egypt as a royal hostage to the West.  Given the probable fragility of the artifact, proving Borchardt’s deceptiveness in acquiring it for Germany was always more of a moral than practical goal.  If nothing else, it would place Germany awkwardly in debt to Egypt.

Meanwhile, the camera lights shine, the presses roll, and cyberspace remains honed-in on Zahi Hawass and his growing crusade to free not only Egyptian artifacts from the evil doers, but to lead all the downtrodden nations in a charge to reclaim what is theirs.  Of course, western universities are welcome to continue to expend resources on, western corporations are welcome to continue to invest in, writers to write about, and Hollywood to exaggerate, Egypt’s culture.  Just be sure to pay a visit to the Vice Minister of Culture’s Office.

 

Update

 

An article from M&C News (“German museum confirms travel ban for Queen Nefertiti“) has provided some additional details about the examination of the bust of Nefertiti with regard to determining her mobility. 

‘An examination in 2007 of the state of preservation of the bust ruled it unsuitable for transport or loans,’ said the Prussian Heritage Foundation, the parent corporation of the museum. ‘Further tests which have not yet been completed only confirm this’ (Source).

And if that isn’t plain enough:

Chancellor Angela Merkel’s top culture aide, Bernd Neumann, said Tuesday through a spokesman that a loan was now “absolutely out of the question on conservation grounds alone” (Source).

 
  

Copyright by Keith Payne, 2009.  All rights reserved.

Photograph “Berlin 053” by RinzeWind is used in accordance with this Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license

Tags: , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Thursday, December 24th, 2009 at 2:31 pm and is filed under Egypt in the News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 comments so far

Jan
avatar
 1 

From the first turn of the spade that yielded the first artefact, ‘foreigners’ have preserved the ancient world of Egypt.

If Hawass wants museums to return artefacts, given to them, as part of the dig, then he must then return the millions of pounds, dollars, marks, liras, francs, that have been spent by westerners preserving the past of Egypt.

It is an insult to the memory of the likes of Flinders Petrie to say that what they “took” , as their share of the dig, decided upon by
the Egyptian Officials of that day, was ‘stolen’.

As to the calling of an International Conference ‘of others who suffered like us”, items stolen during a world war, cannot be classed in the same way as items given in meagre return for the huge amounts of money spent by foreign missions excavating.

The rules of today, cannot be used to change the rules that were in place when the missions found tombs.

Where are all the golden treasures (like Tutankhamen’s) from the other 62 known Valley tombs? Stolen, looted, melted down by Egyptians, not foreign Egyptologists!!!

Almost all academic universities, have contributed to the knowledge of Ancient Egypt.

If it had been ‘hands off’ and left to the Egyptians, to this present day, none would have been educated enough to conduct concise digs, and that includes Hawass.

Every tomb left unplundered by Ancient Egyptians, would have been plundered by modern Egyptians, and artefacts sold off to
the highest bidder, no providence provided.

The artefacts that The Louvre recently returned after pressure by Hawass,
were taken from an already known and excavated tomb, sealed and supposedly protected by SCA officials, put on the market, then bought by the museum !

Right from the first when the outer casing to the pyramids was stripped by Egyptians and used to build a wall, ‘westerners’ could see that if anything was to be preserved of Ancient Egypt, then it was up to them to do it!

Hawass would not have an extremely well paid job bullying about everyone he considers ‘under him’ and the tourist industry would by pass the dirt and decay that would still be Cairo and Luxor.

For giving back the past to the present day Egyptians;
For giving the poor fellahin a job in the tourist industry and therefore lifting standard of living;
For deciphering the hieroglyphs and thus making them live again;
For keeping safe from thieving hands artefacts in foreign museums;
For allowing millions of people to appreciate the past by viewing artefacts in their own town museum;
then it is a poorly ignorant, and self-serving man, who deems that the Egyptologists are thieves and everything is ‘stolen’ and must be returned.

January 6th, 2010 at 1:50 am
Edgard Mansoor
avatar
 2 

Whoever wrote the above comment is one hundred per cent right. Egypt wants back all the antiquities that have left a hundred or two hundred years ago to built Museums in cities like Zagazig, Tanta, Assiut and the like, and for who?

Tourists will not go to these cities to visit these Museums. The most important artifacts are already in the Cairo Museum, and tourists will not even go to the Luxor Museum or to the one that’s being built by the pyramids, and the Museum in Alexandria doesn’t even get a fraction of what the Cairo Museum gets.

Tourists don’t go to Egypt strictly to visit Museums; their time is limited; they also like to visit the bazaars. And between the Museum and the Bazaars, they like to rest. Perhaps they would even like to go to the bazaars again since it doesn’t costs them a penny, rather than go to the Museum again. So! who is going to visit these new Museums? Who else but the farmers who live in Zagazig, Tanta and Assiut.

The only thing that will happen to these Museums is that when built and filled with antiques, the inhabitants of these cities will empty them little by little with the help of the security guards, and sell them secretly to overseas collectors. It will be Egypt’s loss. Don’t tell me that the security guards wouldn’t get tempted seeing that antiques are plentiful, and their salaries are like peanuts.

The storage space of the Cairo Museum is already full of antiquities. Hardly any new discoveries remain in this Museum. Except for a very few important objects, the rest is relegated to the Museum’s basement, or to the new Museums being built.

That’s the reason why even in the Cairo Museum there used to be a shop where lesser important antiques for which there was no space in the basement were sold to both tourists and antique dealers.

Therefore, why not take into consideration the proposition of Mr. Ahmed Ezz, the Egyptian steel magnate, that the sale of some artifacts be allowed in Egypt, following the example of Italy and France?

The only problem is that Culture Minister Faruq Hosni and Dr. Hawass have both threatened to resign if the Egyptian parliament accepted Mr.Ezz’s proposal.

Now then! what would happen if Tourists start to boycott Egypt because of the problems and the frustrations it is causing to the countries that are being harassed by Dr. Hawass? After all there are plenty of Antiques in the Louvre, Berlin and British Museums. Would DR. Hawass prefer to get back the antiquities and no tourists?

Dr. Hawass says that 5,000 artifacts have been returned to Egypt since he started his campaign. Where are these artifacts now? In storage? in the Luxor Museum?

Do all tourists go to Luxor and would they visit the Museum there, knowing that they have seen the best and the most in the Cairo Museum?

More and more antiques are discovered every week or every month, and that’s thanks to the foreign egyptologists who do excavations there. Would Dr. Hawass like to see them all gone? Can he really do by himself the gigantic job they are doing?

Dr. Hawass want back the Nefertiti bus but Germany WILL NOT return it under any circumstances for the only reason that IT IS NOT authentic, and if it returns it, Dr. Hawass will have it examined by a team of international scientists and it will be found to be a fake, and Germany will be highly criticized if not fined by the United Nations for having taken advantage of the gullible public.

Soon, in a next message, I intend to list the reasons why the bust is “one hundred and one percent” a forgery. Nevertheless, it is a very beautiful piece of “Art Nouveau” sculpture.

When King Farouk had been exiled,

February 5th, 2010 at 10:05 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment