From Quarry to Capstone: Transporting the Blocks and Megaliths of the Great Pyramid

Jean-Pierre Houdin’s theory of the how the Great Pyramid was built continues to unfold.  How were the sixty-ton megalithic beams moved from the harbor at the base of the Giza Plateau to 43+ meters high into the Great Pyramid?  Was there a second counterweight system like the one in the Grand Gallery?  Why was Khafre’s Royal Causeway so wide?

In this, the sixth in a series of articles and interviews from Pyramidales writer Marc Chartier, we learn some of the key evolutions in Jean-Pierre Houdin’s theory.  In the few short years between Khufu Revealed and Khufu Reborn, researcher/architect Houdin has expanded his work to account for anomalies surrounding the pyramid of Khufu’s successor, Pharaoh Khafre, and what they tell us about Khufu’s pyramid.

The English-language version of this article was very kindly provided by Marc Chartier, Jean-Pierre Houdin, and the Project Khufu team at Dassault Systèmes exclusively for Em Hotep readers.

 

The "main construction causeway" for the building site

The "main construction causeway" for the building site

The number two has pride of place in Khufu Reborn (aka Khufu Renaissance), the new version of Jean-Pierre Houdin’s reconstitution of the Great Pyramid’s construction. After the two ascending corridors (one for the service circuit inside the pyramid, the other for the “Noble Circuit”), the two horizontal corridors (one giving access to the Queen’s Chamber, the other being a section of the “Noble Circuit”), the two antechambers preceding access to the King’s Chamber, two entrances to this chamber and the two levels of the internal ramp, space was made for two external ramps built on the Giza Plateau to transport the materials used to construct the monument (limestone blocks and granite monoliths from the Aswan quarries).

The first of these ramps, qualified as the “main construction causeway”, follows a line east-west towards the position where the Pyramid of Khafre would later be built; its upper part is equipped with a counterweight system. The other ramp continues towards the south face of the Great Pyramid and enters the monument under construction, as a trench, up to the 70 m level.

 

Tale of a discovery, in several steps

A study of the Giza Plateau, together with the technical implications of transporting the materials used to construct the Pyramid of Khufu, led Jean-Pierre Houdin to the following observation: “Everything on the Giza Plateau proves that the Royal Causeway, connecting the Low and High Temples of the Pyramid of Khafre, was constructed on a ramp that had previously been used for the construction of the Pyramid of Khufu.”

The architect was thus able to provide a significant variant to the theory that he had developed and published in 2007, according to which the Great Pyramid’s construction site was supplied from the port following the natural slope of a wadi (temporarily dry riverbed), workers obviously dragging the sledges loaded with blocks or monoliths along the gentlest slope.

“When I presented my ‘Khufu Revealed’ theory,” Jean-Pierre Houdin tells us:

I explained that the granite beams for the King’s Chamber were hauled up the external ramp using the counterweight system in the Grand Gallery. Well, one day I received this message from someone who attended one of my conferences: ‘Your counterweight enables the beams to be raised from the base of the external ramp as far as the level of the King’s Chamber (+43 m). But how do you get these same beams from the port to your ramp? The distance between them is at least 500 m, and more particularly the port is located 40 m lower than the ramp. Shouldn’t you consider a second system to haul the blocks over this distance?’

This correspondent was right! Explains Jean-Pierre:

If the Egyptians had considered the counterweight solution, they would certainly have applied it to the entire journey made by the beams. A second counterweight would have had to be used to haul the granite blocks from the unloading port for materials coming from Aswan as far as the base of the external ramp. But do traces of its existence still remain?

 

A revealing photograph

The right questions had been asked. It was now a matter of trying to answer them…

Two days later, the architect discovered a photograph of the Giza Plateau with its three pyramids on the Talking Pyramids website. It was taken in 1905, from a balloon, by the aerostat pioneer Eduard Spelterini.

“As I was examining this document,” comments Jean-Pierre Houdin, “an obvious fact came to me: the royal funereal causeway linking the Low Temple to the High Temple of Khafre’s Pyramid had been built on an old ramp. This foundation could only have been used during a construction project before Khafre’s: that for the Pyramid of Khufu!”

Days passed… Then, during a recent trip to Egypt, Jean-Pierre Houdin spent long hours studying the topography of the site at Giza, with the aim of checking the accuracy of his intuitions against Spelterini’s photographs. He describes his observations:

I started by examining Khafre’s royal causeway in order to find any clues to the existence of the ancient ramp leading from the port to Khufu’s construction site. Then I discovered that this causeway, about ten meters wide, is laid on a perfectly uniform foundation 23 m wide, extending 6.5 m on each side, which is the case neither for Khufu’s royal causeway (10 m wide), nor for Menkaure’s causeway (8 m wide). Over the better part of the south side, very large limestone blocks were even put into place to fill in hollows.

After walking back up Khafre’s royal causeway to its western end, I stood exactly where the external ramp for the Pyramid of Khufu should have started. From there, I was surprised to discover a sort of large slab floor, made of limestone blocks, pointing towards the Great Pyramid. These blocks have nothing to do with Khafre’s Pyramid (the transport of the blocks needed to construct this pyramid did not require such an infrastructure), from which I deduced that they would probably have served as the foundation for the external ramp of Khufu’s Pyramid.

Moreover, along its route, this ramp serves several of the quarries on the plateau, which supplied most of the materials for the Great Pyramid. This ramp, currently measuring nearly 500 m with a slope of 8.5%, is ideal for the stresses of moving sledges, even more so for dragging beams loaded onto large sledges on rollers.

 In my view, the conclusion was obvious: the royal funereal causeway connecting the Low and High Temples of the Pyramid of Khafre had been constructed on an ancient ramp that could only have been used on the previous construction project for the Pyramid of Khufu. King Khafre must have reused a route that had served in the construction of his father’s pyramid.

 

Two counterweight systems

The counterweight sliding in Grand Gallery

The counterweight sliding in Grand Gallery

However there remained a problem: human strength alone, which has limits for reasons of co-ordination, could not be sufficient to drag beams weighing up to 63 tons the length of this royal causeway. Jean-Pierre Houdin considers that additional force was therefore absolutely essential: the most logical possibility, given the Egyptians’ technical knowledge at the time, is that the source of this force would have taken the form of a counterweight moving in a slide channel, a technique enabling human strength to be combined with mechanical force, the mechanical force being “rewound” by human force sequenced in time and space.

But if there had been a counterweight, it was still necessary to find traces of it, proof of its existence…

Resuming his observations “on the ground”, Jean-Pierre Houdin then took an interest in the configuration of the second Giza pyramid.

Jean-Pierre Houdin notes:

When you study plans of Khafre’s Pyramid you notice that the funereal corridor leading to the King’s Chamber was dug into the ground, under the monument, about ten meters below the level of the Plateau in this area. But there is an anomaly in its construction. Over a length of 8 m, the Egyptians did not dig the corridor: they built it, floor, walls and ceilings, in stone. Why? The only plausible explanation is that there was a sizeable hole there, a very deep trench requiring special treatment. Now, if we extrapolate the ramp from the port, or royal causeway, as far as the Pyramid of Khafre, we observe that it crosses the funereal corridor exactly where this construction is found.

This meant there could be no further doubt for Jean-Pierre Houdin: in the precise line of the royal causeway starting from the port, and toward its higher end, this trench under the Pyramid of Khafre had been dug into the bedrock at the time of Khufu, to serve as a slide channel for a counterweight system.

Based on the considerable, not to say indispensable, advantages offered by an external ramp built as an “expressway”, he understood that the Giza Plateau had been landscaped to provide the following logistical facilities: a direct ramp from the port to the foot of the pyramid’s external ramp (in red on the sketch above), simplifying and speeding up material supplies to the site; then, as an extension, almost right-angles, a second ramp running towards the south face of the pyramid (in blue). The special feature of this system is that its “driving force” relied on two identical counterweight systems (in green):

It was not possible to use human strength alone, so the architects and engineers decided on the principle of using counterweights from the start of the project, in other words from the design phase. This meant installing two counterweight systems. The first, sited in a trench excavated in the bedrock of the Giza Plateau, to haul the monoliths from the port (level 20 m) to the foot (level 75 m) of the external ramp of the Pyramid of Khufu. A first dragging ramp was built from the port, toward this trench, for this purpose. The second system was sited directly in the heart of the pyramid, between levels +21 m and +43 m: its still visible slide channel, namely the Grand Gallery, is opposite the external ramp that served the construction site up to a maximum level of +43 m.  (Jean-Pierre Houdin)

 

An external ramp… extending as an internal ramp

Another new feature then appeared in the reconstitution of the Great Pyramid’s construction, the Khufu Renaissance version: the configuration of the external ramp extending beyond the royal causeway and heading towards the monument’s south face.

External ramp (level 43 m)

External ramp (level 43 m)

Located on a natural promontory of the plateau, the starting point for this ramp was higher than the pyramid’s base level. The ramp thus reached a height of 43 m (base of the King’s Chamber, with a length of only 325 m. It was extended in a trench, inside the monument, to a height of 70 m (this is new compared with the 2007 hypothesis), the whole thing having a slope scarcely more than 8.5%.

At a height of 70 m, no more than 15% of the volume remained to be built, over an additional 76 m height. This last part of the construction site was out of reach of the external ramp; otherwise it would have been necessary to extend it excessively and make it exceed the volume of the pyramid itself. Hence the necessity for the internal ramp, the central idea of the Houdin theory in its first Khufu Revealed version.

“At the start of my research into construction of the Pyramid of Khufu,” says Jean-Pierre Houdin,

I thought that the Egyptians had built almost three-quarters of the monument using the external ramp. But I was still far away from what they were capable of doing… Discovering the ramp from the port enabled me to position Khufu’s external ramp precisely on the ground. Among other things, I noticed that it arrived at the monument at the level of the base of the King’s Chamber to the west of the south face, almost at the point where the internal ramp ended. During the construction of the King’s Chamber, the pyramid continued to rise normally, except for this southern part where the granite beams were stored.

External ramp (level 70 m)

External ramp (level 70 m)

The external ramp arrived at the south-west corner and continued as a trench in the pyramid by turning clockwise until it reached above the roof of the King’s Chamber (+70 m). The southern part remained at level +43 m while the King’s Chamber was built.

Construction of the internal ramp was therefore interrupted in this southern part, but the Egyptians’ big trick was to continue its construction and use by making it restart from the south-east corner. Thus for several years, teams were dragging sledges on the flat and in the open air at level +43 m, then pulling them up a slope from the south-east corner. When they had finished using the external ramp, the southern part was filled in and a horizontal tunnel was constructed to link the internal ramp from the south-west corner to the south-east corner. This is why, as shown by measurements made in 1986, the section of ramp in this southern part remains horizontal.

"You must first ask yourself the true questions”

"You must first ask yourself the true questions”

By not cutting across the path of the external ramp with the internal ramp during the construction of the King’s Chamber, the Egyptian builders had succeeded in constructing 85% of the pyramid’s volume by using the external ramp. However this trick had one drawback: part of the internal ramp stayed permanently horizontal at level +43 m, but this was largely compensated for by the fact that there remained no more that 15% of the volume to be constructed. On the other hand, there still remained more than 76 m in height to be completed: this is where the internal ramp played its part to the full.”

 

Three complementary ramps

In summary, Khufu’s Pyramid was built using three separate and complementary ramps: the ramp from the port (future Khafre’s royal causeway) used, with its counterweight, as far as the level of the current Pyramid of Khafre; the external ramp, as far as level +43 m of the pyramid, extended by a ramp built in a trench running clockwise as far as the +70 m level; the internal ramp, constructed from the base of the pyramid (south-east side), spiraling counter-clockwise and including a flat part at the +43 m level.

It is precisely onto this flat part (+43 m) that the monoliths for the King’s Chamber and the relieving chambers were first raised (using the counterweight in the Grand Gallery), then stored temporarily before being put in place (still using the Grand Gallery counterweight system) at their various levels to form the ceilings of the King’s Chamber and the relieving chambers.

The "main construction causeway" (in red) and the natural ramp (in blue)

The "main construction causeway" (in red) and the natural ramp (in blue)

To complete this logistical configuration of the Giza site, Jean-Pierre Houdin guides us to a final observation, while still keeping an eye on the plateau’s topography. This time it is connected with the facing blocks made of Tura limestone delivered to the port and those extracted from quarries excavated around the Sphinx and a little higher up.

There was no need for these blocks to take a detour towards the position where Khafre’s Pyramid was subsequently erected. They were quite simply pulled over a small natural ramp (in blue on the sketch above) following the incline of the plateau in order to be brought as far as the entrance to the internal ramp located in the southern face of Khufu’s Pyramid and about 25 m from its south-east corner.

Transported to the foot of the pyramid being constructed, the blocks then began their ascent into the bowels of the monument, following the internal ramp.

“After filming of the ‘Khufu Revealed’ documentary in 2008,” adds Jean-Pierre Houdin,

..and Bob Brier’s discovery of a room behind the notch in the north-east ridge, we were able to use 3D modeling of this area to specify the geometry of the internal ramp. This enabled us to understand the role of this room and gave us very precise information about the route of the internal ramp within the pyramid, because we now had several reference points in space: firstly, at the base of the pyramid, the entrance in the south-east area; then the passage above the rafters of the north-face entrance, then again the end at level +43 m under the west face, and finally this room at +81 m in the north-east edge; the horizontal route of the ramp at level +43 m beneath the south face then became evident.

By relying on the picture of the density anomaly detected in 1986, and by positioning the entrance to the internal ramp precisely using field observations, I was able to reconstruct the likely route for blocks inside the pyramid.

The first section of the ramp (in blue) is parallel to the face and climbed as far as the first corner chamber in the north-east corner. The second and third sections (the first two white segments) climbed ‘at an angle’, because as they rose they followed the slope of the pyramid inclined towards the interior. The fourth section located at a height of +43 m (in yellow) is horizontal and parallel to the south face. The following fourteen sections (in white) climb ‘at an angle’ as far as the summit.”

At each corner of the pyramid, corresponding to the junction between two sections of the ramp, a volume (a room as discovered by Bob Brier) was created to rotate the sledges used to transport the blocks.

One of these volumes, under the north-east edge of the pyramid, gave rise to detailed exploration by the American Egyptologist Bob Brier.

The results will be presented in a forthcoming article on this blog.

 

Interview by Marc Chartier

Illustrations: copyright Jean-Pierre Houdin / Dassault Systèmes

Copyright by Marc Chartier, 2011.  All rights reserved.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Monday, May 16th, 2011 at 8:18 am and is filed under Old Kingdom, Pyramids, The Giza Plateau. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

10 comments so far

tim thody
avatar
 1 

It would increase the credibility of the theory, if it could be shown that there was evidence that the proposed system was then employed to consruct later pyramids at Giza.

March 1st, 2012 at 3:15 pm
tim thody
avatar
 2 

As a result of Saladin’s sons partial demolition of Menkaure’s pyramid, can evidence of internal ramps be seen?

March 2nd, 2012 at 10:01 am
avatar
 3 

Hi Tim,

Thank you for your comments and questions. Evidence of the internal ramp in Khafre and Menkaure’s pyramids would certainly bolster Jean-Pierre’s theory. I know that his research is on-going, and not just with Khufu’s pyramid, but I am not sure of how much I can comment on at this point. Please understand that this is not to be “dodgy”, but sometimes people share information with me that has not yet been made public in order to help me further understand what has been made public in order to explain it better for my readers. The Supreme Council of Antiquities has very strict rules about how information is shared, and if it does not go through the proper channels, the concession to work in Egypt can be revoked. This has happened in the past.

I will pass your questions on to Jean-Pierre, who is very good about answering people’s questions to the best of his ability. Check back over the next couple of days and I am willing to bet you will have some answers.

Thanks again,
–K

March 2nd, 2012 at 10:24 am
Jean-Pierre Houdin
avatar
 4 

Hi Tim,

To answer to your first comment:

You can be sure that I’ve studied Khufu’s pyramid deeply and the other big pyramids and the small ones too, and that I also have evidence regarding what I put forward regarding their construction processes.

The large smooth pyramids of the 4th Dynasty were built “INSIDE-OUT”, which means that the materials had to be delivered inside the perimeter of the pyramid and that the facing was done first, layer after layer.

As they were very high, they were built thanks to 2 processes:

- In the basic concept, a large exterior ramp (first process) up to one third of the height (2/3 of the volume) and a small internal ramp (second process), starting from the base, for the last two thirds in height (but only 1/3 of the volume).

- In reality, thanks to a better use of the external ramp, which could continue its rise in a trench in the body of the pyramids, this first process allowed to go up to near half the height for around 80% of the volume done, leaving only the upper half of the height and around 20% of the volume to be made thanks to the internal ramp, the second process. Moreover, this internal ramp starting from the base allowed the Egyptians to re-use the material from the external ramp to build the upper part of the pyramid…NO WASTE…Every stone extracted from the quarries was used for the construction; it’s why no remains of a ramp were found on the Giza Plateau.

The internal ramps are structurally strong enough and there was no need to fill these ramps with masonry or sand. So, they are still there…same as new…

The pyramids having an internal ramp in their body are: Bent and Red in Dahshur, Khufu and Khafre in Giza and most certainly the one in Meïdum. and that’s all…

The small smooth pyramids were also built “INSIDE-OUT”. These smaller pyramids (around 60m high and less) built after Khafre’s pyramid and during the 5th and 6th Dynasty were built thanks to a…CONSTRUCTION GAP…

Dr Dieter Arnold, the famous egyptologist, who is now at the head of the Egyptian Department at The Metropolitan Museum in New York, who has worked in Egypt since the late 80′s, wrote a remarkable book: “Building in Egypt” Pharaonic stone masonry. Page 180 and 181, there are 2 pictures of the pyramids of Sahura and Neferefra in Abusir showing these “construction gaps”. Dr Arnold doesn’t say too much about it, missing this point…But they prove that the Egyptians were INSIDE the body to built these pyramids.

At the end, the construction gap was filled with the same materials as the body…limestone blocks…

To answer to your second comment:

Menkaure’s pyramid is not a large smooth-sided pyramid (1/10th of Khufu’s pyramid volume), so this pyramid was not built with an internal ramp, there was no need.

At last, I give you my feeling about which pyramid has the best architectural and engineering design ever done…

As much Khufu’s pyramid is a marvel of everything, this one is a little too “complex”…which led to an end to large smooth pyramids…

So, for me, the “finest, leanest, purest,simpliest” pyramid is the…Red…

You will understand WHY one day…

All the best

Jean-Pierre Houdin

March 2nd, 2012 at 4:25 pm
Gideon Dreyer
avatar
 5 

Dear Sir, maybe I have not read all the information therefore this question. Dragging the stones up the internal ramp means the sleigh will have to go down again to drag up the next stone for I assume the ramp was too narrow for up and down traffic at the same time. Do you imagine it this way or is there another. Thank you so much I do so enjoy this development of information. Gideon.

March 21st, 2012 at 7:26 pm
avatar
 6 

Hi Gideon,

Thank you so much for reading and participating! You are correct, the internal ramp was too narrow to allow the empty returning sleds to bypass the upcoming laden ones. Originally Jean-Pierre had theorized that there was a wooden external ramp that allowed the empty sleds passage back down. Since this outer structure was added after the casing stones were in place, it would not have interfered with the building process the way a winding external ramp would have during the actual building process itself.

But ongoing work and new discoveries have convinced Jean-Pierre that the internal ramp was actually a bi-level deal, with the returning sleds coming down via the “upstairs” as laden sleds were being pulled up via the “downstairs”.

I hope the picture above helps demonstrate, although the chaps upstairs seem to have forgotten their sled!

–K

August 12th, 2012 at 11:25 am
Susan Leogrande Alt
avatar
 7 

I couldn’t sleep, so instead of sheep, I counted stones flowing from quarry to the Nile and into the pyramid!

Question this time is for Jean Pierre and concerns the stones themselves.

Jean Pierre has previously described how each stone was given a number and position at the quarry as to where it should go once it arrived at the port. I’m sure some needed attention – mistakes are made cutting angles or perhaps even in size, ect.

What I’ve not read about yet, and am hoping to (wink wink) is what happened to those stones that didn’t make it to the Giza site? Surely some would have been lost as boats sank. Could there be a trail of these “lost stones”, each with it’s quarry marks and numbers on the bottom of the Nile, or if the Nile has moved since then, buried in the sands?

And what would they have done to correct these lost stones? Would it not mess up the continuity of the numbering system? Or, were the numbers on the back of the stones more indicitive of where the stones were to go upon landing at the Giza complex … to be there given more precise detail as to placement?

Oh so worried about those lost stones! And the boats that hauled them. Wouldn’t that be a find … a boat sunk into the sands or Nile, still with it’s stone(s) intact!

Looking forward to more details and am positive I’ll get them. This site simply rules for complete and open, intelligent and rational, meaningful discussions! LOVE IT!

April 3rd, 2013 at 7:34 am
Susan Leogrande Alt
avatar
 8 

After reading and thinking about the Sphinx and the new work from Jean Pierre, I revisited this section … and as usual … questions.

Why were there so many little quarries instead of one BIG one? Was it the quality of rock?

July 18th, 2013 at 11:44 pm
Lorri
avatar
 9 

I find Jean-Pierre’s ideas brilliant, however, what confuses me about the internal ramp idea is how did they get the top of the pyramid on? Obviously an internal ramp can only go up so far, then what? At what level does the internal ramp stop and what happens after that to finish the top of the pyramid? Thanks in advance for any ideas. Lorri. x

November 26th, 2013 at 2:03 pm
Lorri
avatar
 10 

Can you describe how the top of the pyramid is finished using the internal ramp theory. It’s the only bit i just don’t understand. Thank you!

November 28th, 2013 at 4:46 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment