The Great Sphinx – A Pyramidales Interview with Jean-Pierre Houdin (Part 2 of 3)

jphspx2 - 00Last week we published Part One of Marc Chartier’s interview with Jean-Pierre Houdin regarding the Great Sphinx.  In that installment Jean-Pierre made the case for Khufu being the face which adorns the mighty guardian of the Memphis Necropolis.  This week, in Part Two, we will be looking at the physical evidence for setting a date for the Sphinx’s construction.  Enjoy!

 

 

Pyramidales:

I agree, at this point in our conversation, that for you, and to the contrary of some kind of “Pensée Unique”, the Sphinx must be related to Khufu and not to Khafre.

Do we know anything about the reason, or reasons, which led the King to add such a monument to his pyramid?  What was its meaning and function?  Why would the King have chosen to be portrayed with a human head and a lion body?

 

Jean-Pierre Houdin:

As I said previously, I think that the outcrops on the Plateau must have played an important role, the one from which the head of the Sphinx was carved having an additional particularity: its position at the lower end of the Plateau, on South/East side of Khufu’s pyramid. Don’t forget that at that time, Memphis was the capital and was erected towards the Southeast of the Plateau, a little more upstream in the Nile Valley. This situation must already have led the architects and geometers to choose the site of Khufu’s pyramid at the edge of the promontory overlooking the Valley. Doing this, the pyramid was clearly visible from Memphis. Between both, the town for the workers was set between the Hill of the Crows and the Nile, on the South side of the port which was divided into two parts: one side to supply food to the town and one side for unloading materials coming from Turah and Aswan. The main view and approach axis was from the Southeast and the closer one came to the Sphinx, the more impressive this perspective became. Thus the Sphinx appeared like a guardian of the site looking towards the East, from where the sun rises every day, announcing the rebirth of the King in an eternal cycle. The position and orientation of the rocky outcrop must have inspired its planners, and even more, don’t forget that the Giza Plateau is a huge necropolis and the idea to protect this sacred area must have been foremost in the minds of the builders.

The Sphinx bears Khufu’s pyramid on its back

The Sphinx bears Khufu’s pyramid on its back

 

 

jphspx2 - 02

For everything, there is always a first. Let’s say that the Sphinx launched a concept that would become a standard in all the following Dynasties. Why the body of a lion and a human head to represent the King? Certainly because the lion is seen as the King of animals (and still is today) and to give it the face of the King was symbolic, a fusion of power and royal wisdom.

I’m not an Egyptologist and I can’t swear to it, but my feelings and analysis are based on my experience as an architect which bases all reflection on the context of the builders’ time, when the entirety of this part of the Plateau was one gigantic building site.

 

 

Pyramidales :

I want to imagine how the Giza Plateau looked like at the end of Khufu’s reign, notably without the two big pyramids of his successors. We have, on the higher part on the North side, Khufu’s pyramid and the Upper Temple, and, on the East side, the Valley Temple, far from the area we are talking about, plus the Sphinx and its own Temple at the lower end of the ramp of the port. What does the Sphinx mean in the context of the landscape? If it had an essential meaning, why didn’t the other kings – Khafre and Menkaure – imitate their predecessor and built their own Sphinx? Otherwise, do we have to see this as a mark of megalomania on the behalf of Khufu?

 

 

Jean-Pierre Houdin :

At the early stage, I don’t think that the Sphinx was seen as an essential element, but rather as an additional element. The position of the rocky outcrop must have been what originally inspired the builders to create this monument there, and their motivation carried the work forward.

For me, after having meticulously studied the Plateau for years, it is evident that the Sphinx was carved under Khufu’s reign and that it bears the face of this King.  So, what was the motivation for this grand addition to Khufu’s complex?

In addition to the most impressive pyramid ever built, did Khufu desire to manifest his overwhelming power and impose his mark on the Plateau with this sculpture which would turn him into God?

There must have been a plenty of advisers at the Palace for that kind of project.  That would be consistent with the idea of some Egyptologists who think that the end of Khufu’s reign saw a battle with no mercy between the Royal power and the priests, with the priesthood opposing a King who was becoming a too powerful, like a living God; the priests were not willing to live in the shadow of the King.

On the opposite, some think that the Sphinx would have been built by Djedefre as a tribute to his father. I don’t believe, for many reasons, that Djedefre would have constructed the Sphinx during his own reign, which could mean that Djedefre took upon himself a regency in the last years of Khufu’s reign. Some inscriptions, being attributed to him and dating from just before the end of Khufu’s reign, have been discovered on beams covering the pit of Khufu’s Solar boat; that could give some credence to this hypothesis. Moreover, we are sure that Djedefre was in charge of Khufu’s funeral ceremonies, which implied that he was his designated successor.

Furthermore, during the Fourth Dynasty, design and construction of pyramids were more linked to the principle of evolution rather than revolution; why would the Sphinx not simply be a project planned from the beginning of the design when we look at its position at the foot of the Plateau and at the core of the building site?

Anyway, I don’t think that the carving work began in the early years. My opinion is that the first hammer and chisel strokes were done around the end of the construction of the King’s Chamber, thus around year sixteen, at the earliest, when the port was reserved for just the unloading of the Turah limestone blocks.

This geological reason could thus explain the absence of large Sphinxes for the other pyramids: no rocky outcrop, no oversized Sphinx. Otherwise, the idea to put several Sphinxes in a funerary complex did eventually happen, such as the statues that were set in place at the entrance of the Temples starting from Khafre’s reign, for example, at his Valley Temple. The fashion, if I can use this word, was thus launched.

The Giza Plateau at the end of Khufu’s reign

The Giza Plateau at the end of Khufu’s reign

 

 

Pyramidales :

Nowadays, the Sphinx appears to us in a particularly damaged shape. On the one hand, and accordingly to one of the retained hypotheses, its face could have received the sacrilegious shots from the Mameluks artillery. On the other hand, its immediate environment bears marks from erosion caused by rainfall and water runoff which, even if they are not frequent in Egypt, can be notably violent.

When comparing the weathered condition of the sculpture and its enclosure with other buildings on the Plateau, some people think that the Sphinx is older, perhaps much older, than the pyramids.

What do you think about such a reading of the site ?

 

 

Jean-Pierre Houdin :

A theory, proposed in the 50’s and recently back on the front stage, tries to prove that the Sphinx was already present on the Giza Plateau several thousand years before the construction of the large pyramids.  This theory is supported, in its demonstration, by the analysis of the rain erosion which can be seen on the walls of the Sphinx enclosure.

Although the hydrological and geological reports are quite pertinent, in no case can the proposed conclusion stand on this single observation because two basic parameters are missing in this study: the original topography of the Giza Plateau and the upheavals resulting from the construction of the pyramids of Khufu and Khafre.

The addition of these two parameters leads to a totally opposite conclusion and strengthens the fact that the Sphinx was effectively carved at the time of the construction of the large pyramids, more precisely under Khufu’s reign, as I’m in the process of demonstrating.

After this initial introduction, I’ll allow myself, my Dear Marc, to expand a little more on this topic which requires a very detailed explanation because of the importance of my conclusion, a conclusion which fully supports everything I have been saying.

As we have already seen, The Sphinx is a monolithic sculpture directly carved from the bedrock, the head from a rocky outcrop and the body by quarrying down and around the body, creating around it a several meters deep enclosure edged by vertical walls. To summarize, the Sphinx literally springs up from its own quarry.

jphspx2 - 04

 

 

 

jphspx2 - 05

The erosion by wind and sand left horizontal marks of varying depth on the enclosure walls depending on the quality of the limestone stratums, while rainwater erosion, due to water runoff, cut vertical grooves on these same walls.

As one can notice on the photo above, the most noticeable rainwater erosion is found on the enclosure walls on West (in the background) and South (on left) , while the much lower wall on North (on right) is less eroded.

On both photos of the western wall below, the water runoff seems to be evenly spread along  the wall, showing a regular flow of water from the overhanging quarries inserted between Khafre’s Royal Causeway and Khufu’s pyramid.

jphspx2 - 06

jphspx2 - 07

On the North side of the Sphinx enclosure (Above Sea Level 20), Khufu’s pyramid is built at a higher level (ASL60), creating de facto, with the Queens pyramids and the Royal mastabas, a barrier on this part of the Plateau. Between both, the ground slopes down toward the South as shown by the arrangement of the stratums of the western wall of the Sphinx enclosure.

Both of the photos below show the South-East corner of the enclosure and the Causeway which goes along it for a few meters. On the southern wall, one can observe the marks of the water runoff which dug deep vertical grooves into the wall.

One can also note that the enclosure was partially filled between the back of the Sphinx and the western wall.

jphspx2 - 08

Some details about the enclosure wall in the South-East corner

Some details about the enclosure wall in the South-East corner

jphspx2 - 10

The photo below shows the South wall as seen from the South-West corner of the enclosure, and the very close presence of the masonry (rebuilt) of the North wall of Khafre’s Royal Causeway. One can notice that in the first part, close to the South-West corner, the grooves made by the water runoff are very deep and the wall is getting closer to the Causeway in steps (the shadows highlight this phenomenon); to the contrary, in the second part, closer to the Valley Temple, the wall is much less eroded and there is no step. The water runoff didn’t erode the South wall the same way all along and the “free passage” between the wall and the Causeway is thinner in the first part.

jphspx2 - 11

The space between the pit and the masonry of the Causeway is quite eroded in the upper part; one can also notice the strong mark of a water runoff at the bottom of the pit.

jphspx2 - 12

A closer look at the water runoff erosion at the bottom of the pit

jphspx2 - 13

On the aerial view below, one can find all the details discussed above, particularly the path of the water runoff at the bottom of the pit; this starts directly below the upper part of the South wall which is the most eroded (red ellipse). Something visible in this photo now becomes very important: the base of the masonry of the North wall of the Khafre’s Royal Causeway (yellow line). This built and roofed Causeway started from the North-West corner of the Valley Temple and ends at the Upper Temple on the East side of Khafre’s pyramid, the distance between both being around 500 meters.

jphspx2 - 14

At last, one can notice on the photo below that there is no visible trace of erosion due to water runoff at the bottom of the pit on the North side, on the right of the Sphinx; this is a strong confirmation of a relation between cause and effect in the South part (left).

jphspx2 - 15

Let’s go back to the topography of the Giza Plateau before the construction of the pyramids.

jphspx2 - 16

(The North is on top of the picture)

As can be seen on this topography diagram, the contour lines of the Giza Plateau delineate an inverted “oyster shell” seen from top and on the East-West axis; the lower point, on the East, is at level ASL20 and the higher point, on the West, is at level ASL105. This shell is edged on the East, North and West by cliffs and on the South by the dried bed of an ancient waddi, which carved its path from West to East, as the contour lines show.

 

jphspx2 - 17

On a central and oblique line oriented North-East / South-West, the Egyptians will successively build the three large pyramid while sticking perfectly to the ground: the first one on the North, Khufu’s pyramid, straddling on the contour line ASL65; the second one, in the center, Khafre’s pyramid, straddling on the contour lines ASL70 and ASL75; the last one, on the South, Menkaure’s pyramid, between contour lines ASL70 and ASL75. As for the Sphinx, it was carved on the East, between contour lines ASL20 and ASL30, its head being carved in a rocky outcrop standing there.

jphspx2 - 18

In the beginning, the rainwater runoff followed the natural slopes linked to the topography. Thus, all the rainwater falling on the ground in the area of the “shell” included between the future pyramids of Khufu and Khafre and the future Sphinx flowed towards the South-East of the waddi, speeding up because of the increasing slope before ending in the bed of the Nile.

jphspx2 - 19

The topography was modified first with the construction of Khufu’s pyramid, with two major events which altered the topography of the Plateau:

 

  •  the construction of a ramp linking the port of the building site up to the base of the main temporary external ramp built to deliver materials,

 

  •  the opening, on both sides of this ramp, of the main quarries which supplied almost all the limestone blocks used for the construction of the volume of the pyramid, behind the facing blocks made of Turah limestone .

 

At the end of the construction, the Plateau looked as it is shown below on this 3D model:

jphspx2 - 20

This new morphology led to a modification of the path of the rainwater runoff coming from the North and West areas of the Plateau: the quarry on the North side of the ramp of the port collected a large part of this water, which was then veered towards the pit in which the Sphinx has been carved before ending in the port and the Nile. The West enclosure wall started to be regularly eroded all along its length, while the remaining water runoff flowed on the ramp of the port and in the southern quarries before joining the waddi and the Nile.

The red arrows indicate the new path of the rainwater runoff after the construction of Khufu’s pyramid.  The yellow lines show the first rain runoff erosion on the walls of the quarries (erosion which can be seen nowadays on the western enclosure wall of the Sphinx and on the South side of the foundations of Khafre’s Causeway).

The red arrows indicate the new path of the rainwater runoff after the construction of Khufu’s pyramid. The yellow lines show the first rain runoff erosion on the walls of the quarries (erosion which can be seen nowadays on the western enclosure wall of the Sphinx and on the South side of the foundations of Khafre’s Causeway).

(erosion which can be seen nowadays on the western enclosure wall of the Sphinx and on the South side of the foundations of Khafre’s Causeway).

The erosion on the western enclosure wall of the Sphinx which is highlighted by the yellow line on the 3D model

The erosion on the western enclosure wall of the Sphinx which is highlighted by the yellow line on the 3D model

The erosion on the South side of the foundation of Khafre’s Causeway which is highlighted by the yellow line on the 3D model

The erosion on the South side of the foundation of Khafre’s Causeway which is highlighted by the yellow line on the 3D model

After Khufu’s pyramid completion, the water runoff on the Plateau had changed, but the consecutive erosion was still largely spread on the ground.

 

jphspx2 - 24

Once again, the rainwater runoff would be disrupted, this time by the construction of Khafre’s pyramid. The choice of building site for Khafre’s pyramid was linked to economic considerations. In actuality, the architects took full advantage of the topography of the Plateau and previous work done under Khufu’s reign to offer King Khafre a pyramid competing with that of his father, all of which was accomplished at a much lower cost. The project can be summarized as follows:

 

  •  a location of the pyramid at a level around ten meters higher than Khufu’s pyramid,
  •  a slightly more sloping area which allowed more of the bedrock to be left in place under the pyramid, reducing the need for filler material and thus requiring less quarried material compared to Khufu’s pyramid,
  •  more bedrock cut  from around the site itself, the pyramid being built in an impressive quarry, thus reducing the transportation of a large part of the materials,
  •  a smaller square base (215m instead of 230m), a steeper slope (53.1° instead of 51.4°) for a slightly lower height (143.5m instead of 146.7m) and for a total volume of about 372.000m3 less (2.211.000m3 instead of 2.583.000m3),
  •  a much simpler internal plan, the funerary apartments being “dug” into the bedrock in parallel with the construction of the pyramid, with no need to build any constructional device like the Grand Gallery in Khufu’s pyramid,
  •  the re-use of the ramp of the port from Khufu’s era as the foundations of the Royal Causeway linking the Valley Temple and the Upper Temple,
  •  the clever “visual” integration of the Sphinx and its Temple in the new funerary complex, without misappropriation of the original function of these.

 

It is obvious that the architects succeeded their goal because Khafre’s pyramid stands majestically on the Giza Plateau, often stealing the spotlight from Khufu’s pyramid in the photos brought back by millions of tourists visiting; in fact, Khafre’s Pyramid often appears on the covers of magazines with the caption: The Great Pyramid.

On the other hand, the same architects seem to have apparently undervalued one parameter: the gutter effect on the rainwater runoff which would become a hard thing to control once the works were completed.

jphspx2 - 25

 

jphspx2 - 26

On this 3D model of the Giza Plateau with the three pyramids completed, one can see all the quarries which were exploited for the construction of these monuments and right in the middle of these, an impressive masonry barrier which cuts the topography in two distinct parts: the Royal Causeway of King Khafre.

As we have already seen, this Causeway was built on the former ramp of the port of Khufu’s building site with a detail which now becomes important: the width of the Causeway itself was around ten meters while the width of the ramp below was around twenty four meters, leaving a paved “sidewalk” about six meters wide on both sides of the Causeway. The sidewalk on the North side started from the exit of the Upper Temple and ran along the Causeway down to the Valley Temple, being level with the natural topography on two precise spots: the first dozens of meters from the Upper Temple down to the western wall of the Northern quarry and the area included between the East side of this quarry, above the Sphinx enclosure pit, and the Valley Temple.

The Northern sidewalk of the Causeway was lined all along the Northern quarry by a vertical wall, this one being lowered from West to East. Without noticing, the architects built a true “gutter” created by the North wall of the Causeway and the six meter wide sidewalk.

The “gutter”, in red, running along the Royal Causeway

The “gutter”, in red, running along the Royal Causeway

The erosion by rain water runoff left the trace of the former Royal Causeway as one can notice on site nowadays. The level of the “sidewalk-gutters” of this Causeway is slightly lower than the level of the original foundations which are still visible on the Plateau.

jphspx2 - 28

jphspx2 - 29

After the completion of Khafre’s pyramid, the eastern part of the northern quarry, overhanging the pit of the Sphinx (inside the red ellipse), and the northern sidewalk in the South-West corner of the pit were at the same level.

That led to a new modification of the path of rainwater runoff in this area of the Plateau, as indicated by the red arrows on the 3D model below; a bottle-neck was thus formed in the South-West corner above the pit of the Sphinx (inside the red ellipse), the water runoff running down in the gutter and the one from the area North of the Causeway entering in collision. During violent storms, the runoff would have been quite tumultuous in this junction point: thus, the pit was becoming an outlet, the vertical walls being deeply gullied by the water in the area as also at the bottom of the pit before finding its path towards the port and the Nile.

This more important erosion was not due to more frequent and stronger rains, but because of a violent increase of the quantity of the runoff in a precise spot during strong rains.  As a clue, anyone who has been under a thunderstorm in Cairo will have noticed the violence of this event, the quantity of water falling on the ground in a short period of time often being very impressive.

jphspx2 - 30

Even if over time the quarries on the North side of the Khafre’s Causeway became filled with sand, looking at the panoramic view below, one can easily understand that all the rain runoff converged towards the area pointed out by the red ellipse on both pictures.

jphspx2 - 31

Let’s go back now to the theory about the Sphinx being carved many ages before the construction of the pyramids, during a hypothetical era of strong rains. After a careful analysis of the topography of the Plateau, the main question that comes to mind is: while the normal rainwater runoff, as we have seen, follows a path from North/North-East towards South/South-East, why is the vertical wall on the South side of the pit of the Sphinx the most eroded by the runoff whilst the slope continues towards South/South-East after this vertical wall?

In a general topography not disturbed by the construction of the pyramids, logically, the most affected vertical walls should have been the western and northern walls, whilst the southern wall would have been preserved: the water can’t flow uphill…

So for the erosion patterns to make sense a disruptive element must have been added to the topography: this element is Khafre’s Royal Causeway which channeled the water runoff towards the pit of the Sphinx. There is no valid climatic argument which allows asserting that the Sphinx was carved 10,000 years ago.

The Khafre’s Royal Causeway drove the water runoff towards the pit of the Sphinx

The Khafre’s Royal Causeway drove the water runoff towards the pit of the Sphinx

 

jphspx2 - 33

Copyright by Marc Chartier & Jean-Pierre Houdin, 2013.  All rights reserved.

Tags: , , ,

This entry was posted on Sunday, July 21st, 2013 at 5:00 am and is filed under Monuments, Old Kingdom, The Giza Plateau. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

16 comments so far

Richard O'Neill
avatar
 1 

Fantastic Stuff!

July 24th, 2013 at 6:16 am
jbo
avatar
 2 

This explanation of the erosion of the enclosure walls looks interesting, but it doesn’t address the more important fact of the erosion on the Sphinx itself. The body of the Sphinx seems equally eroded on all sides and that can only be the work of rainwater coming directly from above, that is form the sky. And what about the head of the Sphinx, that seems to have been recarved (under Khufu or Khafre) from a possibly much older head? One doesn’t need to be an expert to realize that the actual head is noticibly too small for the body. It just doesn’t make sens that the ancient Egyptians would have first built a disproportionate Sphinx as it is now. Moreover, the head bears much less erosion than the body; how can that be explained if the head has not been recarved much later than the body?

July 24th, 2013 at 7:12 am
Jean-Pierre HOUDIN
avatar
 3 

Jean Bouchard d’Orval (jbo)
You know that my answers are on facebook…;-)

So everyone who wants to get these can go to this link…

https://www.facebook.com/jphoudin/posts/10151725433989757?comment_id=26941108&offset=0&total_comments=18&ref=notif&notif_t=share_comment

July 24th, 2013 at 1:00 pm
Susan Leogrande Alt
avatar
 4 

Jean Pierre – nice work. Growing up on a “hill” farm in West Virginia, I have seen the results of water as it moves over ground that is uneven yet sloping in the same direction. Of course, the leave and foliage add an element which they did not have on this plateau. YET, the results are the same. As we added and removed certain elements, the water drainage changed. Thanks to these details – almost too much so for the layperson who doesn’t have your unique 3D ability and training – I am able to now understand the land around these monuments. Having never been there, I had the impression that the land was pretty flat, little slopes. Oh! How wrong I was and how simplistic an impression I had of the land slopes and all you have written of here.

Might you make or add to your 3D piece some rain so we might see this runoff happening while the pyramid is being built and the great cat as well?

On another note – the BOTTOM of the great cat … is it part of the natural bedrock or were the stones laid down? I know you addressed this in your interview – but to be honest, I can’t comprehend it and so want to! I think you said that the head was a natural large enough rock formation that was carved to resemble the King. The bottom came next as it was used as a quarry? If I’m following you correctly, the cat may be out of proportions due to the use or lack of need for the stones in this quarry?

Thanks for this and I simply can’t wait for the next piece!

July 24th, 2013 at 3:26 pm
Jean-Pierre HOUDIN
avatar
 5 

Hi Susi,

Go to this facebook link…
There is a discussion about what you are asking…

https://www.facebook.com/jphoudin/posts/10151725433099757?comment_id=26938517&notif_t=like

The whole Sphinx is part of the natural bedrock sace the front legs…masonry built…at the origine…

Otherwise, you should go back to my facebook home page

https://www.facebook.com/jphoudin

And scroll down to July 16

There is a pic from Sandro Vanini…in grey and blue

Look closely to this pic, you will be able to “imagine” the rain run-off coming from the Southwest corner of the enclosure wall of the pit and spreading on the ground at the bottom of the pit…
Not an hard task to imagine…

Cheers

July 25th, 2013 at 8:25 am
Mathias Glad
avatar
 6 

Nice work JP! :-)

Just like jbo´s statement: “One doesn’t need to be an expert to realize that the actual head is noticibly too small for the body. It just doesn’t make sens that the ancient Egyptians would have first built a disproportionate Sphinx as it is now.”

I also have thought about this the last 20-25 years. I wouldn´t be surprised if the head is recarved (out from a lion head) during Khufus/Khafres period.

Maybe a clue about this in part 3 ? ;-)

July 26th, 2013 at 3:36 pm
matPROx
avatar
 7 

So, we can be sure the Sphinx was create in the same time as GP or earlier. That means the Sphinx is not Khafre. It can be, and probably is Chufu. But can we proove for sure, the Sphinx is not older than quarry around it?(was not curved earlier?). Can we proove for sure the Sphinx and GP are dated correct? And the head – don’t fit – whatever You say. Looks like cement/concret reconstructed years after. How can we be sure the Sphinx was’nt a lion oryginally?

July 26th, 2013 at 7:52 pm
Aladin Fazel
avatar
 8 

thanks a lot for the fantastic work!

July 27th, 2013 at 9:58 am
Patrick Giles
avatar
 9 

Fascinating, Monsier Houdin. Your research parallels mine in many ways, which I’m sure you may have noticed. I think we are in agreement about the rainwater phenomena, although we have differing conclusions. Still, I found your interview very interesting and insightful. Cheers and thank you!

July 27th, 2013 at 11:13 am
Jean-Pierre HOUDIN
avatar
 10 

These remarks about the non-proportioned parts of the Sphinx are from people from our era with our own view of aesthetics…
Think differently…

If the body Sphinx would have been carved proportionally to its head, the Sphinx would have been quite ridicoulous…Certainly not as much as impressive as it is…
The aim at that time was to impress the people…nothing else…
Now, it’s the size of the outcrop (yardang) standing there which is the main cause of the size of the head.
Read Part 1…
The outcrop exists because of a stronger limestone…
I say that the head of the Sphinx was carved in a yardang like the ones one can see on the Hill of Crows…
45 centuries ago there were almost exactely as they are now … and the head of the Sphinx was eroded at the same speed as the yardangs of the Hill… So not much…
(don’t forget that the head has been largely restored in our times)

That gives you an idea about what the architects had in mind when they first saw the yardangs…they looked like the Sphinx’s head…naturally !!!

And look at the topography: the Sphinx is pinned, to the North and to the South, between the main ramp of the port and the small ramp, starting also from the port and leading to the entrance of the internal ramp… and to the West and to the East, between the quarries and the port…so was the yardang before being carved as the Sphinx head…

The Turah limestone at the top of Khafre’s pyramid is not eroded…the edges are still perfect, so that also gives you an idea about erosion by rain fall, wind and sand during these 45 centuries.

Moreover, look at the front legs of the Sphinx…Much longer than in reality…and they were built in masonry…these are also disproportionate.

The Sphinx was carved to be seen from Southeast, so the angle of vision had an important part in the design…
The other only remaining view was from the Sphinx Temple…because there was not so much space between the entrance of the Temple and the port in front of it…one could have a larger view only while coming by boat…
And the Sphinx Temple was at a lower level than the floor level of the Sphinx…and was unroofed…so once in the Temple, one would only see the head of the Sphinx.

We, tourists, we walk around the Sphinx…In that time, it was out of question.

Go to the Sistine Chapel in Roma and look at the ceiling…Nobody is proportionate…Adam’s head is like the Sphinx head…smaller than normal with regards to the body…
In Firenze, the statue of David in front of the Palazzo Vecchio : look at the head and the hands…much bigger than in reality…
So one head is smaller, another is bigger but they have something in common: the artist… Michelangelo…
Who cares ?

Otherwise, look at many Sphinx carved after the Giza one…often the head is oversized !
So, proportions were not a finality…

July 28th, 2013 at 9:25 am
avatar
 11 

Fascinating read, Jean-Pierre. So much to learn from these ancient pragmatic people… Thank you, Marc Chartier for publishing. :)

July 30th, 2013 at 3:12 pm
avatar
 12 

Wonderful read! Thanks for explaining so clearly.

Just have one doubt. Shouldn’t Khufu’s quarry prevent the run-off instead of contributing to the western wall? I believe the wind-sand and back-fill material in the quarry would have made it more difficult for the rain water to saturate and generate run-off on the western wall of the Sphinx! In fact the western wall is therefore shown as a prove that the enclosure exists much before the quarry, is that wrong?

August 18th, 2013 at 7:44 am
Jean-Pierre HOUDIN
avatar
 13 

Hi Abhijit,

Thank you for writing…

I think you should read again this Part 2…
The western wall was the first to get water run-off :

“his new morphology led to a modification of the path of the rainwater runoff coming from the North and West areas of the Plateau: the quarry on the North side of the ramp of the port collected a large part of this water, which was then veered towards the pit in which the Sphinx has been carved before ending in the port and the Nile. The West enclosure wall started to be regularly eroded all along its length, while the remaining water runoff flowed on the ramp of the port and in the southern quarries before joining the waddi and the Nile.”

And the Khufu’s quarries overlooking the Sphinx pit were not filled by wind-sand before many centuries.

Read Part 3 and the conclusion:

“As a conclusion, don’t forget that with time, the whole Giza Plateau was buried by sand and that the pit of the Sphinx was filled too, as well as the neighboring quarries. We know, thanks to Stela of Thutmosis IV, that the Sphinx enclosure was already completely filled with sand in 1400 BC. One can estimate that the sanding over of the Plateau goes back to the First Intermediate Period, around 2100 BC, when the necropolis was overrun by dwellings before being deserted at the beginning of the Middle Kingdom. The main erosion of the pit of the Sphinx by the air, sand and water must have only been possible during just over a quite short period of time, less than four centuries, to be compared to the age of the enigmatic Sphinx looking Eastward for 45 centuries.”

I don’t see anything in what is written which could you let you think that the western wall was already on site before the quarries !
What you wrote is just…wrong :-(

September 1st, 2013 at 6:45 am
Malcolm McLean
avatar
 14 

Everyone says that the Sphinx’s head is too small for its body. But it’s a human head on a lion’s body. Lions are rather larger than humans.

November 24th, 2013 at 10:38 am
Claudia Martínez
avatar
 15 

Hello. Thank you for this excellent information. Just one question: how far was the Nile from the Giza plateau at the time the pyramids were built?

December 11th, 2013 at 1:13 am
Julia Cazita-Mazeaud
avatar
 16 

While I believe the marriage of art and science to be integral to our understanding and development, you, Jean-Pierre, have confirmed it in your discourse. Foreshortening is the term, and you will find it as Dali jumps thought the gallery in Barcelona, or on the sidewalks decorated by the English Artist, Julian Beever.
Our Egyptian counterparts were clearly respectful of the impact that the visual image can give. They ruled far and wide and it is easy to understand the effects that these structures had upon travellers and storytellers.
Even today, people still connect a theory of alien intervention that will pique the interest of even the most disconnected observer. The incredible architectual achievements here, are rarely rivaled, and they say the best form of marketing is word of mouth. This would have perpetuated the Egyptian rule.

December 29th, 2013 at 4:59 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment